Girl Games

[magicianforce2]

ok i made a small vid last war in high quality

CODE

RES: 1680x1050
   time: 3:39
   size: 97MB
   encoding: X.264 + AAC
   container: MP4

FileFront link

tested with:
VLC
MPC

if others want a lower quality Xvid version, tell me, i'll make it then.
note: it played smooth on my 2,6ghz dual core :]

1280x800 Xvid
Megaupload Xvid

This post has been edited by magicianforce2: Jul 22 2008, 09:58 AM

[QBuff]

1) Pointless to make such resolution videos
2) Short
3) A lot of running lol

This post has been edited by QBuff: Jul 20 2008, 01:59 PM

[magicianforce2]

1) Pointless to make such resolution videos
2) Short
3) A lot of running lol

1) just wanted to try a high res once.
2) i know, get me a full version of fraps for vista
3) first time working with vegas (i know how i can speed up things), didn't have enough material to make a full action vid.

[harph]

1) Pointless to make such resolution videos
2) Short
3) A lot of running lol

1) no, higher res is actually more enjoyable
2) short doesn't mean bad. I hate the long cw videos, they are boring
3) this might be a valid point, if it is indeed short, then there shouldn't be any running. See point 2, I hate the long videos because they are 70% running and 30% action.

anyway I can't play full HD here, I would have to go to my dual core to check it out so maybe later :>

[QBuff]

1) no, higher res is actually more enjoyable

Most people won't even be able to view it at that. lol

[magicianforce2]

1) no, higher res is actually more enjoyable

Most people won't even be able to view it at that. lol

if others want a lower quality Xvid version, tell me, i'll make it then.

nobody rly asked me about that yet

edit:
btw tested too with: laptop 1,6 ghz duo
VLC: big lag in the beginning after the first 3 text slices have passed, the rest is smooth
MPC: no big lags but plenty of small lags

conclusion: use VLC if you want to enjoy the video better on a low end system

This post has been edited by magicianforce2: Jul 21 2008, 09:03 AM

[NeW]

not alot of action^^
but the quality is nice

[Excelsis]

1) Pointless to make such resolution videos
2) Short
3) A lot of running lol

1) no, higher res is actually more enjoyable
2) short doesn't mean bad. I hate the long cw videos, they are boring
3) this might be a valid point, if it is indeed short, then there shouldn't be any running. See point 2, I hate the long videos because they are 70% running and 30% action.

anyway I can't play full HD here, I would have to go to my dual core to check it out so maybe later :>

This video isnt full HD.

Video is... meh, although I do like In The End by Linkin Park.



And it ran at full speed on my single core-based comp using Media Player Classic and FFDShow filters.

[magicianforce2]

Excelsis, cpu speed?

and thanks for the nice comments, i'll make more with more action, mb even in full hd if some want :] (tho then i've to play in the living room on our tv)

[MilchSchnitte]

can't view it correctly, when i play it with VLC, the colors are kinda weird and bugged - i made a snapshop via VLC, everything is fine on ss - dunno why i can't view it

[Excelsis]

Excelsis, cpu speed?

and thanks for the nice comments, i'll make more with more action, mb even in full hd if some want :] (tho then i've to play in the living room on our tv)

AMD 64 3000+@2.4ghz. Nothing fancy.

[magicianforce2]

can't view it correctly, when i play it with VLC, the colors are kinda weird and bugged - i made a snapshop via VLC, everything is fine on ss - dunno why i can't view it

guess your cpu is too slow to decode the movie :]

@Excelsis
i kinda remember that for full hd decoding you need 3,0ghz, but since this isn't full HD you don't need 3,0ghz and 2,4ghz is sufficient

ppl, i guess i'll make an Xvid version. stay tuned.

Xvid Version now uploading,
video is same size
tho res downscaled to 1280x800

and somehow after 1:50 the quality seems the same as the X.264 but before it looks ugly as hell, any experienced video maker knows what that can be?

http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=GZ1Q5PX7

This post has been edited by magicianforce2: Jul 22 2008, 09:56 AM